About Us
We are the well-wishers of humanity. And our only aim is to bring out the TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH-however disagreeable it may be. Learn the TRUTH of the Gujarat riots of 2002 by reading this site.
Busting the Media Myths
We are the well-wishers of humanity. And our only aim is to bring out the TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH-however disagreeable it may be. Learn the TRUTH of the Gujarat riots of 2002 by reading this site.
October 5th, 2008 at 11:15 am
Please find Jan Sangharsh Manch’s comments on the Nanavati Commission and the Report prepared by Jan Sangharsh Manch throwing light on what happened in Godhra.
http://nsm.org.in/2008/09/30/godhra-incident-revisited/
September 1st, 2008 at 3:32 am
@Pratik Sinha
Before I could open this site again and see the questions you have asked me, 2 persons Mr. Rajesh Nayak and the Nationalist, had already replied to your queries. So please be aware that the new Indians and specially the Hindus wear their faith and nationalism on their sleeves.
And about your query to keep the ‘discussion relevant’, I am just informing you about what’s going on in Bengal, so be ready to face the music if any misgivings continue to happen as shown in the link below
http://islamicterrorism.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/murshidabad-muslims-behead-husband-for-being-of-different-religion/
And if you say that
“I do not believe in religion. Am neither Hindu, nor Muslim.”
better keep out of it, rather than patronising a psuedo-secular organisation like nsm.
When you are coming to India, be sure to write down a mail, I shall arrange for your stay here and be there to welcome you, afterall we are known for our hospitality, and have welcomed Parsis, Sindhis, Kasmiri Pandits, and many more
Regards
August 31st, 2008 at 4:03 am
Read this article-of India Today weekly-dated 22 July 2002. http://www.hvk.org/specialrepo/guild/15.html
August 31st, 2008 at 3:50 am
Ha ha ha…Mr Sinha, this report is rubbish. What are you saying? The stone-pelting was done by Muslims-and the train was burnt with PETROL which had been brought a day before. Read India Today dated 22 July 2002 to know the full details. Many of the accused of the Godhra massacre-like Haji Bilal, Mohammad Kalota etc have confessed to commiting the horrific massacre. Godhra is well-known for Muslim fundamentalism right since 1927.
August 31st, 2008 at 2:39 am
Some more info.
http://nsm.org.in/2008/08/30/fabricating-systematic-lies-fsl-report/
August 30th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Mr Pratik Sinha,
Your report on post-Godhra is absolute rubbish. It does not mention the fact that the Gujarat police saved 2,500 Muslims in Sanjeli, on 1st March 2002,and thousands in Bodeli, and Viramgam. It does not bother to report that in the first 3 days-98 people were shot dead by the police. The police shot dead 5 Hindus outside Ehsan Jafri’s house on Feb 28. On Feb 28, the police shot dead 10 Hindus in Ahmedabad alone by evening-as reported by The Hindu the next day.
The post-Godhra report ignored the killings of HUNDREDS of HINDUS. This article brings out the truth of the Gujarat riots.
http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2007/11/gujarat-ka-sach-truth-about-gujarat.html
August 30th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
Mr Pratik Sinha,
India Today weekly dated 22nd July 2002 -gives in detail the names of the witnesses-who testified these statements. The Railway Security officers have given signed statements to the police to these effects-as reported by India Today.
The Muslims cut the coach with swords-again mentioned by weekly India Today dated 22 July 2002.
Your defence that-many passengers did indeed run away-made me laugh. What prevented the remaining 59-who were burnt to death-from running away?
Gayatri Panchal-a 16 year old survivor-and many others who survived the attack-have clearly testified that the attack was planned, the mob was ready and waiting -and unprovoked-and Muslims brutually murdered the unarmed 59 karsewaks-including 14 children and 26 women.
You are DEFENDING Muslims’ stone pelting-and blaming the innocent dead 59 karsewaks for ‘ill-treatment’ to them. What evidence do you have to prove that there was any ill-treatment meted out to Muslims in the first place? And in any-case, does mere ill-treatment mean stone pelting on them is justified?
August 30th, 2008 at 3:57 am
@Common Man
The question here is what happened in Godhra. This is a blog talking about Gujarat Riots and hence my submission to this blog. Hence please keep the discussion relevant.
I do not believe in religion. Am neither Hindu, nor Muslim.
August 30th, 2008 at 3:50 am
@Rajesh Nayak
1-If it was an accident, and not a murder done by Muslims-then why did the karsewaks not run away from the train when it caught fire?
[PRATIK] Good Question - According to the confessions of several Karsevaks themselves (under oath) in Nanavati Commission, they fled from the backdoor and there was no Mob there.
[PRATIK] Next question, Why didn’t all of them escape then? Thats because there wasn’t enough time because of the flash fire.
Please see Slide 67 onwards on following presentation:
http://nsm.org.in/2008/08/02/the-truth-of-godhra/
2- There was heavy stone-pelting done on the train and stones were recovered from the site. Who did that?
[PRATIK] Muslims did that, and they were obviously retaliating to the ill treatment meted out to them by the Karsevaks.
3- Muslims forcibly entered the train by cutting some parts with swords-which is well-documented.
[PRATIK] Where is it documented? Is there a single submission like that there under oath in a judicial court with evidence?
4-A senior Railway security official has said that he heard cries of ‘Islam Khatre mein hein-kafro ko kaat dalo’ (Islam is in danger, butcher the infidels) from the loudspeaker of a mosque close to where the coach was burnt.
[PRATIK] Again, where’s the documentation? where did this office confess this under oath?
This nonsense report given is nowhere near the truth of the Gujarat riots or Godhra. The bitter truth that Muslims can commit murder cannot be accepted by some people.
[PRATIK] Please read the report from a scientific point of view and try to understand whats written.